Object lessons are everywhere!
Today we discussed one of the most fundamental principles of liberty and agency at breakfast. It was quite unexpected and certainly not planned, but it was the perfect object lesson. It came about because, of all things, cereal.
Over the weekend one of my sons played in a baseball tournament that was hosted by a town where Malt-O-Meal has a plant. My son's team took 2nd place in the tourney and part of their winnings was that each player received a bag of Malt-O-Meal cereal. He chose a cinnamon toast-flavored cereal which is one I rarely buy.
I wasn't feeling well this morning so cooking wasn't high on my priority list right out of the gate. I announced that it was cold cereal for breakfast. My one son happily grabbed his prized bag of cereal and proceeded to have his breakfast. His brother and sister sat like vultures, wanting his cereal and trying to guilt him into sharing. Then they tried to get me to back them up and command that the cereal be shared.
Instead, I pointed out that they had zero claim on that cereal and no right to ask for it.
In the first place, did they earn that cereal? What had they done to procure it or deserve it? It was their brother's, fair and square, earned with his own physical toil. Most tournaments give trophies or t-shirts to the first and second place winners, but this time it was something else. Had he won a trophy, would they each take a turn displaying it on their dressers? No. Had he won a t-shirt would they each take a turn wearing the shirt? No. So just because it was a dividable and desirable prize, that doesn't make it something they can claim. Just because they wanted it, didn't have any of their own, and/or hadn't had the opportunity to get their own, doesn't make it something they can claim. If he wanted to share, that was HIS CHOICE. But the prize was his, his own, and his own only and NO ONE had the right to say he had to divide it up and give it away.
I am truly appalled that so few people seem to understand this principle these days. I agree that there is an imbalance and injustice in wages paid for wages earned. I've always thought a janitor should make more money than a professional athlete or a recording artist. My son tells me that no one will pay big bucks to see a janitor work. True, I concede, but when one goes to watch the athlete, he expects a clean stadium and doesn't want to be sitting in some Joe's spilled beer and vomited hot dog; should anyone have to clean that up for dimes on the dollar? Still, no one has the right to take something that belongs to one person and give it to another. NO ONE. Not even the government. My kids tried to appeal to their "government" this morning and get a redistribution of cereal wealth, just because they wanted it, and all without having done a thing to earn it and, in actuality, have me condone robbing their brother of his earnings. My daughter said, "But he should share. That's the nice thing to do." Yes, it is. But there is a difference between sharing, willingly, and being robbed. Charity is only charity if it is given willingly and freely. Would any of my children ever develop a sharing attitude with their siblings (or anyone) if I always automatically took a portion of what was rightfully theirs and distributed as *I* saw fit? Would they ever learn true stewardship or see real need or magnify any benevolent feelings if they were constantly being robbed and left with little to steward and no choice?
"...this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat."
(2 Thessalonians 3:10)
"Thou shalt not be idle;
for he that is idle shall not eat the bread nor wear the garments of the laborer"
(D&C 42:42)
"Wo unto you poor men, whose hearts are not broken, whose spirits are not contrite, and whose bellies are not satisfied, and whose hands are not stayed from laying hold upon other men’s goods, whose eyes are full of greediness, and who will not labor with your own hands!"
(D&C 56:17)
"He that tilleth his land shall be satisfied with bread:
but he that followeth vain persons is void of understanding."
(Proverbs 12:11)
"He that tilleth his land shall have plenty of bread:
but he that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough."
(Proverbs 28:19)
"Surely the churning of milk bringeth forth butter,
and the wringing of the nose bringeth forth blood:
so the forcing of wrath bringeth forth strife."
(Proverbs 30:33)
God Himself doesn't want to command in all things but wants us to choose, based on our knowledge of right and wrong; compelling "goodness" is a law of Satan and of men:
"For behold, it is not meet that I should command in all things; for he that is compelled in all things, the same is a slothful and not a wise servant; ... Verily I say, men should be anxiously engaged in a good cause, and do many things of their own free will, and bring to pass much righteousness; For the power is in them, wherein they are agents unto themselves." (D&C 58:26-28)
The redistribution of wealth is not caring nor sharing; it is one of the greatest thieves of liberty and agency.